|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
| Profile Information | |||||||||||||
CashClickerTM StatsBeta
|
|||||||||||||
| More Information |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| My Friends | View All 332 Friends |
| About Me |
|
More rice! More money!
|
| My Latest Blogs | View All Blogs | ||
|
How to Blow Your Credit Limit -- Without Spending
Monday March 30, 2009
by Kelli B. Grant
Thursday, March 12, 2009provided by If you haven't had the credit limit cut on your credit card recently, count yourself lucky. Risk-averse card issuers are getting slash happy. And while many cardholders gripe that such cuts slice razor-close to their balance amounts, for an unfortunate few the cuts go far deeper: below what they currently owe. Under different circumstances, David Chaplin-Loebell wouldn't have minded that American Express cut his unlimited credit line to just $5,000. Except that when AmEx reduced his line in October, he had an outstanding balance of $10,000. "I found out by having a business purchase declined," he says. Repeated calls to AmEx failed to yield an answer about why the cut was made. Chaplin-Loebell, who lives in Philadelphia, is now paying the balance under his regular card terms, and presumes the line will free up for new purchases once he's below the limit. "For now, they've essentially frozen the account," he says, leaving him to juggle business expenses on his personal cards. American Express did not respond to requests for comment. Nasty as it may be, the practice of cutting credit lines below the balance is legal -- at least, for now, says Chi Chi Wu, a staff attorney for the National Consumer Law Center, a consumer advocacy group. Federal Reserve rules requiring lenders to give cardholders 45 days notice before reducing a credit line to the point that it would trigger penalties won't go into effect until July 2010. "[Until] then, there are no federal protections," says Wu. Congress is also hoping to rein in unscrupulous credit-card practices. In February, Sen. Chris Dodd (D., Conn.), chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, reintroduced the Credit CARD Act, which among other things, offers cardholder protections like the ability to pay under the existing terms if an account is closed and requiring issuers to lower penalty rates within six months once a cardholder gets back on track with payments. Earlier this month, the House Committee on Financial Services chairman Barney Frank, announced a series of four hearings that will include discussions about credit card reform. SmartMoney.com contacted both committees to see if they were aware of issuers' practice of cutting credit lines below balances, and if they planned to address it in upcoming hearings. Neither responded to requests for comment. The motivation among issuers to make such deep cuts that they plunge below a cardholder's balance amount isn't very clear. Usually, issuers cut credit lines to reduce outstanding liabilities -- they sometimes may even chase the balance on riskier accounts with further limit cuts as cardholders pay down debts, explains Bill Carcache, an analyst with investment bank Fox-Pitt Kelton. But cutting below the balance doesn't reduce an issuer's liability: The cardholder still owes the outstanding debt. One possibility is that this is yet another attempt by card issuers to get consumers to close their accounts (while bringing in a little fee income in the short term), says Dennis Moroney, research director and senior analyst for consulting firm Tower Group. "I can't rationalize in my mind what other motivation there would be," he says. Paul Pensabene of Saratoga Springs, N.Y., received a statement from HSBC on Dec. 8 that said he had a $359.99 balance and remaining available credit of $8,640. But when he went online to pay the bill several days later, his online account showed that same balance put him over his newly-reduced credit line of $300. And that didn't include the $35 over-limit fee. Pensabene grappled with customer service until they agreed to remove the fee, and then paid the balance in full. "All I could think was, 'Good lord, what if this is happening to someone that couldn't pay their balance off in one shot?'" he says. "They'd end up in default with these fees piling up." HSBC declined to comment on individual cardholder accounts. Spokeswoman Cindy Savio says the issuer has tightened its credit standards based on the economy. "As we have previously stated, in an effort to reduce credit risk and refine strategies for our card business, we have tightened credit standards, reduced or canceled higher risk credit lines, and closed a number of inactive accounts," she says. While the fees, frozen accounts and default interest rates resulting from credit-line cuts can sting your finances, they can do some serious long-term damage to your credit score. Your credit utilization ratio -- the total amount of debt you owe in relation to the amount of credit available to you -- accounts for roughly 30% of your score. A credit line cut has the potential to decrease your score by 50 points or more if you don't have much other available credit, says Craig Watts, spokesman for FICO, the company that calculates and issues the credit score that most lenders use. Even cuts that are close to the balance have the potential to devastate if they're not caught quickly. Luckily for Carol Gressett of Decatur, Miss., she noticed the reduction in her Discover-branded Sam's Club card limit just days after it happened. The limit was cut to within $100 of her $3,000 balance. The official letter notifying her of the reduction arrived three weeks later. "We could easily have gone over if I hadn't been paying attention," she says. (A Discover spokesperson says GE Money issues the cards, and so is responsible for managing credit lines. GE Money did not respond to requests for comment.) Copyrighted, SmartMoney.com. All Rights Reserved. http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/106716/How-to-Blow-Your-Credit-Limit-Without-Spending
Obama economic plan now tops $900 billion
Wednesday February 04, 2009 WASHINGTON – The cost of President Barack Obama's economic recovery plan now exceeds $900 billion after the Senate added money for medical research and tax breaks for car purchases. It could go higher Wednesday if a tax break for homebuyers is made more generous, even as centrists in both parties promise to clear away spending items that won't jump-start the economy immediately. In an interview on CNN, Obama signaled a willingness to drop items that "may not really stimulate the economy right now." He also signaled he'll try to remove "buy American" provisions in the legislation to avoid a possible trade war. In a victory for auto manufacturers and dealers, Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., won a 71-26 vote to allow most car buyers to claim an income tax deduction for sales taxes paid on new autos and interest payments on car loans. The break would cost $11 billion over the coming decade but could mean savings of $1,500 on a $25,000 car. "Just as we need to get the housing market going, we need to get auto sales going," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. Wednesday's session could produce even more generous savings for homebuyers. Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., is pressing for a tax credit of up to $15,000 for everyone who buys a home this year, at a cost of $18.5 billion. The pending measure would award a $7,500 tax credit only to first-time homebuyers. At the same time, centrist senators, including Ben Nelson, D-Neb., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, are seeking to cut tens of billions of dollars from the legislation. They're operating with the blessing of Democratic leaders, who hope a successful effort could attract some GOP votes for Obama's plan. Obama summoned Collins to a White House meeting Wednesday afternoon, a Collins aide said. Democratic leaders conceded they may soon be obliged to cut billions of dollars from the measure. "It goes without saying if it's going to pass in the Senate, it has to be bipartisan," said Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democratic leader, adding that rank-and-file lawmakers in both parties want to reduce the cost of the bill. In a series of skirmishes Tuesday, the Senate turned back a proposal to add $25 billion for public works projects and voted to remove a $246 million tax break for movie producers. Both moves were engineered by Republicans who are critical of the bill's size and voice skepticism of its ability to create jobs. But several hours later, GOP conservatives didn't contest approval of a $6.5 billion increase in research funding for the politically popular National Institutes of Health. That amendment, by Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, drove the price tag of Obama's plan just above $900 billion. Democratic leaders have pledged to have the bill ready for Obama's signature by mid-month, and in a round of network television interviews Tuesday, the president underscored the urgency. He told CNN that even three months ago, most economists would not have predicted the economy was "in as bad of a situation as we are in right now." He also spoke out against efforts to require the use of domestic steel in construction projects envisioned in the bill, telling Fox News, "We can't send a protectionist message." Mikulski's office put the cost of the automobile tax break she sponsored at $11 billion over 10 years. It would apply to the first $49,500 in the price of a new car purchased between last Nov. 12 and Dec. 31, 2009. Individuals with incomes of up to $125,000 and couples earnings as much as $250,000 could qualify, including those who do not itemize their deductions. Republicans are expected to seek a vote later in the week on a plan to inject the government into the mortgage industry in an attempt to drive down interest rates on mortgages to as low as 4 percent. Democrats treaded carefully on the proposal, saying they would consider it but also claiming the $300 billion Republicans allocated would not come close to accommodating the demand.
Wow! Good News in Housing
Tuesday January 27, 2009
Jan 27, 2009 (Zacks Investment Research via COMTEX News Network) -- Companies noted here include D.R. Horton (DHI), KB Home (KBH), MGIC (MTG), PMI Corp (PMI) and Colgate Palmolive (CL).In December, existing home sales rose 6.5% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.74 million from November's rate of 4.45 million (originally reported as 4.49 million). Even more encouraging, the inventory of homes for sale dropped a sharp 11.7% to 3.68 million.While it is normal for inventories to drop in December, this was a much bigger-than-normal drop. That puts the months of supply down to 9.3 months, from 11.2 months in November.As the Chart (from http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/) shows, 9.3 months is still pretty ugly (normal is 4-5 months), though it is good to see it moving rapidly in the right direction. On the other hand, the increased sales came at a price, namely a much lower price. The price of a median home fell 15.3% from a year ago and now stands at $175,400. This is also sharply below the median price for all of 2008 of $198,000, indicating the slide in prices is continuing. Distressed sales, mostly foreclosures, accounted for 45% of all sales in December.
The improvement in sales happened for both single-family homes (up 7.0% month over month but down 1.4% year over year) and for condos (up 2.1% month over month but down 18.4% year over year). The Northeast was the only region that did not see an increase in sales on a month over month basis, falling 1.4%, and down 14.3% year over year. It has also seen the least deterioration in median price over the last year, down 7.8% to $235,000. The Northeast is the smallest region of the country in terms of housing. The West had the biggest improvement, with sales up 13.6% on a month-over-month basis, and up 31.6% year over year. However, it also had the largest drop in median price of 31.5% to $213,100. The South, which has by far the most home sales, posted the next best performance, with sales up 7.4% on a month-over-month basis, but down 11.2% year over year. The median price in that region is down 8.0% year over year to $158,600. The Midwest was up 4.0% month over month and is down 10.3% year over year. It is the cheapest region with a median home price of $140,800, down 11.4% from a year ago. This shows that the market does work -- if prices get low enough, people will buy. Lower prices are not without costs, most significantly the wiping out of the equity of millions of Americans. I don't think the decline in home prices is over, but perhaps this is at least the end of the beginning. While there seems to be a little bit of light at the end of the tunnel, it still strikes me as too early to jump into the Homebuilders like D.R. Horton (DHI) and KB Home (KBH). The decline in home prices is also a significant negative to the Private Mortgage Insurance firms like MGIC (MTG) and PMI Corp. (PMI). Stick to safer names like Colgate-Palmolive (CL), instead. Read the full analyst report on DHI Read the full analyst report on KBH Read the full analyst report on MTG Read the full analyst report on PMI Read the full analyst report on CL Get real-time market insights and profitable stock recommendations from the team of analysts at Zacks Investment Research.See all today's Analyst Blog entries. Copyright (C) 2009, Zacks Investment Research.
http://www.wallst.net/news/IDCNEWS/2009/01/27/wow-good-news-in-housing/ |
|||
| My Videos |
| My Latest Comments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|